In the realm of professional management , there are instances of misconduct that slip through the cracks , and then there are stories that question the values of an organization . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , is a perfect example of the latter — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that deeply harms the reputation of a solitary executive but throws doubt over the enterprise’s integrity.

Despite a range of troubling accusations , Collins has kept his position , seemingly unaffected by the turmoil swirling around him . How has this been permitted to continue ? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? Based on insider information , Collins’ history of unprofessional conduct was marked by infractions of the business principles, but it didn’t end there . Instead, it escalated into a pattern of misconduct that has left colleagues jaded and clients puzzled .

Amid a management development session — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities —David Collins allegedly converted what should have been a growth-oriented experience into a David Collins KeriKeri spree of inappropriate episodes . It’s reported he spent organization-paid excursions engaging in flirtatious behavior , a clear breach of Ventia’s organizational standards, all while his home life was kept in the dark.

But the additional reading ethical breaches didn’t conclude with these encounters . One of the gravest disclosures involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a clear misuse of professional tools and a breakdown of professionalism . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to distribute risqué communications—including emoticons signaling illicit encounters — reveals a character of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these digital overtures , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on several instances during work time , despite his relationship status and her having a partner . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources broke all norms of professionalism but resulted in personal devastation — leaving a path of mistrust that extended well beyond the workplace .

What reason can this behavior be permitted to persist ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly overstepped every rule is still in a position of power at Ventia? The advice rationale, it appears, stems from a concerning absence of supervision within the organization . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins operates without restraint .

This lack of consequence sends a dangerous message : that status and power within the company can serve as a safeguard. It fosters a poisonous corporate culture , disheartens staff , and ultimately damages the firm’s reputation .